Uso de tecnología en el servicio registral inclusivo: un análisis bibliométrico
Use of technology in inclusive registry services: a bibliometric analysisContenido principal del artículo
El objetivo principal fue analizar las investigaciones existentes sobre el uso de tecnologías emergentes en el contexto de los servicios registrales inclusivos. Se adoptó una metodología bibliométrica con un diseño no experimental longitudinal, consultando la base de datos Scopus, sin restricciones temporales. Los datos extraídos se procesaron mediante Bibliometrix, VOSviewer y Datawrapper para crear mapas científicos y realizar análisis estadísticos. Los resultados revelan un creciente interés (14.56% promedio anual) y producción científica en torno a esta temática (1122 documentos) y una colaboración internacional destacada (18.36%), destacando la participación de países como Estados Unidos, Canadá y China. La tecnología blockchain emerge como el enfoque predominante, mientras que los tokens no fungibles y los aspectos legales y regulatorios también son temas centrales. Finalmente, se concluye que el uso de la tecnología en el servicio registral inclusivo ha experimentado un crecimiento significativo, reflejando la importancia de adoptar soluciones innovadoras para promover servicios registrales más transparentes, eficientes y accesibles.
The main objective was to analyze existing research on the use of emerging technologies in the context of inclusive registry services. A bibliometric methodology with a non-experimental longitudinal design was adopted, consulting the Scopus database without time restrictions. The extracted data were processed using Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and Datawrapper to create scientific maps and perform statistical analyses. The results reveal growing interest (14.56% annual average) and scientific output on this topic (1,122 documents) and significant international collaboration (18.36%), highlighting the participation of countries such as the United States, Canada, and China. Blockchain technology emerges as the predominant focus, while non-fungible tokens and legal and regulatory aspects are also central themes. Finally, it is concluded that the use of technology in inclusive registry services has experienced significant growth, reflecting the importance of adopting innovative solutions to promote more transparent, efficient, and accessible registry services.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Adler, A. (2023). Artificial Authenticity. New York University Law Review, 98(3), 706–769.
Alcón, A. P. (2023). The acquisition (or not) of property in the metaverse: The tokenization of real estate assets. Revista de Derecho Civil, 10(2), 163–185. https://n9.cl/ecdivw
Argelich, C. (2022). Smart Property and Smart Contracts Under Spanish Law in the European Context. European Review of Private Law, 30(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022011
Becker, S., Schmidt, F., y Kao, O. (2021). EdgePier: P2P-based Container Image Distribution in Edge Computing Environments. Conference Proceedings of the IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference, 2021-Octob. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCCC51483.2021.9679447
Bigda-Wójcik, A. (2023). Unlocking the digital realm: Exploring NFTs as catalysts for digital copyright exhaustion. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 18(11), 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad079
Chen, X., y Si, J. (2021). Design and Research of a Government Affairs Office Platform. Mobile Information Systems, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1775663
Dinneen, J. D., Krtalić, M., Davoudi, N., Hellmich, H., Ochsner, C., y Bressel, P. (2024). Information science and the inevitable: A literature review at the intersection of death and information management: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75(3), 268–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24861
Exter, E., y Radosavljevic, M. (2023). Applying Action Design Science Research to Develop a Conceptual Design for Smart Contracts in Real Estate Transaction Processes: The Potential of Blockchain Technology for Transaction Symmetry, Speed and Transparency. International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS57930.2023.10305905
Kharitonova, Y. (2024). Tokenization of the Creative Industries: The Intersection Between Emerging Technologies and Sustainability. In Law, Governance and Technology Series, 64, 59–75. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51067-0_4
Konashevych, O. (2020). Cross-blockchain protocol for public registries. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 16(5), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-07-2020-0045
Konashevych, O. (2021). “GoLand Registry” Case Study. In L. J., P. G.V., & H. S. (Eds.), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 489–494. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463720
La Diega, G. N. (2022). Internet of things and the law: Legal strategies for consumer-centric smart technologies. In Internet of Things and the Law: Legal Strategies for Consumer-Centric Smart Technologies. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468377
Lie, G. (2022). Block Chain Application on Property Law: Meeting Legal Certainty for Creditors in Bankruptcy Cases. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756116
Martins, T. B. (2023). A brief analysis regarding NFTs and digital artworks. In M. P., C. N. delle R. Istituto di Informatica e Telematica Via G. Moruzzi 1, Pisa, V. I., D. di I. dell’Informazione ed E. e M. A. Universita degli Studi di Salerno Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, Fisciano, B. S., & D. di M. e I. Universita degli Studi Perugia Via Vanvitelli, 1, Perugia (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 3460). CEUR-WS.
Nekit, K. (2023). Legal nature and types of digital assets in the activities of technology-oriented startups. Juridical Tribune, 13(2), 304–326. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/2.08
Pirnay, L., Deventer, C., y de Sousa, V. A. (2023). Providing Customer Value through Non-Fungible Tokens: A Preliminary Study. In B. T.X. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vols. 2023-Janua, pp. 4543–4552). IEEE Computer Society.
Polanco, R. (2023). The Impact of Digitalization on International Investment Law: Are Investment Treaties Analogue or Digital? German Law Journal, 24(3), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.30
Reichel, J. (2023). The European Strategy for Data and Trust in EU Governance. The Case of Access to Publicly Held Data. Ceridap, 2023(4), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.13130/2723-9195/2023-4-10
Rutskiy, V., Allam, S., Elkin, S., Beknazarov, Z., Semina, E., Ikonnikov, O., Kuzmich, R., y Tsarev, R. (2023). Non-fungible Tokens: Value for Digital Arts and Pricing Factors. In S. R., S. P., & P. Z. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems: Vol. 596 LNNS (pp. 805–816). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21435-6_70
Saraswat, H., Jasola, S., y Manchanda, M. (2023). Efficient integration of big data with blockchain: Challenges, opportunity and future. Journal of Autonomous Intelligence, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v6i3.726
Saull, A., Baum, A., y Braesemann, F. (2020). Can digital technologies speed up real estate transactions? Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 38(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-09-2019-0131
Schwiderowski, J., Pedersen, A. B., Jensen, J. K., & Beck, R. (2023). Value creation and capture in decentralized finance markets: Non-fungible tokens as a class of digital assets. Electronic Markets, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00658-z
Souei, W. B. S., El Hog, C., Djemaa, R. B., Sliman, L., y Amor, I. A. B. (2023). Towards smart contract distributed directory based on the uniform description language. Journal of Computer Languages, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cola.2023.101225
Trujillo, A. (2022). Hyperownership: Beyond the Current State of Interaction with Digital Property. HT 2022: 33rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media - Co-Located with ACM WebSci 2022 and ACM UMAP 2022, 240–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511095.3536373
Weisbord, R. K., y Sterk, S. E. (2022). The commodification of public land records. Notre Dame Law Review, 97(2), 507–562. https://n9.cl/x41ca4
Wilcox, A. A. E., Provencher, J. F., Henri, D. A., Alexander, S. M., Taylor, J. J., Cooke, S. J., Thomas, P. J., y Johnson, L. R. (2023). Braiding Indigenous knowledge systems and Western-based sciences in the Alberta oil sands region: A systematic review. Facets, 8(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2022-0052
Wu, Y., Lu, Z., Yu, F., y Luo, X. (2020). Rapid consortium blockchain for digital right management. In P. J.-S., L. Y., L. J.C.-W., & C. S.-C. (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing: Vol. 1107 AISC (pp. 447–454). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3308-2_48
Wynn, M., y Irizar, J. (2023). Digital Twin Applications in Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study from a German Multi-National. Future Internet, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15090282
Yang, Z., Keung, J. W., Yu, X., Xiao, Y., Jin, Z., y Zhang, J. (2023). On the Significance of Category Prediction for Code-Comment Synchronization. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3534117
Zhu, C., Li, J., Zhong, Z., Yue, C., y Zhang, M. (2023). A Survey on the Integration of Blockchains and Databases. Data Science and Engineering, 8(2), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41019-023-00212-z